New Page 3

La Avenida de las Americas

 

In the mid 1990s, I assembled 400 acres of prime land on Via Ventura, east of Pima Road and west of the 101, between Via Ventura and the 101 interchange on the northwest corner of the Salt River Indian Community.

 

With two freeway interchanges this was an ideal property to develop a regional mall. The original mall site on Scottsdale Road north of Bell Road was floundering. This opened the door for another north Scottsdale site.

 

I retained a Los Angeles regional shopping center mall architect to develop a layout of a proposed regional mall with four anchors. I then contacted the Urban Land Institute (ULI) to evaluate the proposed mall and Roy P. Drachman Sr., one of the founding members of ULI graciously accepted the assignment.

 

Roy had a daughter in Scottsdale and this was probably the primary reason for his visit to Scottsdale to view the proposed mall site.

 

Roy agreed with me this was a superb site for a regional mall but the only way it could work would be to land a first class anchor.

 

Everyone knew Nordstrom's was looking for a Scottsdale site. I contacted Nordstrom's and they liked the Via Ventura site but Nordstrom's wanted a $24 million incentive check for locating their store on my site.

 

Wescor could write a check for this amount and they did. This is how Nordstrom's ended up at the Scottsdale Fashion Square.

 

Never the less, I knew a good site when I saw one.

 

Today, there is another prime piece of property but because of development constraints, it remains a blighted area.

 

With all regional malls, it is a common knowledge, anchors are not high profit centers for developers but without anchors, regional malls do not develop. The profit centers of the smaller stores between the anchors is where malls make money.

 

If the Phoenix downtown area is thought of as an anchor and the area south of the Maricopa Freeway could be developed as La Playa del Sol, then the area in between these two anchors would have high potential for development.

 

The most attributing factor for possible development is the area bisected by the Maricopa Freeway with two prime intersections at 7th Avenue and 7th Street.

 

This area bisected by Central Avenue south of the Phoenix downtown area between 7th Street and 7th Avenue (could stretch out to 19th Avenue) remains a blighted no man's land (term for land that is not occupied or developed to its highest and best use).

 

Yet, with the Phoenix downtown area on the adjacent block to the north and south to the Rio Salado, this area could have high development use if not for Sky Harbor airport approaches and departures over the area.

 

This area probably has been neglected because of the chiseled in concrete dictate of those involved with Sky Harbor Airport but nothing ever remains constant.

 

If someone said to Sky Harbor staff, "Look at changing departures and arrivals coming in from the west and don't come back until modifications can be made," I think traffic could be modified to accommodate development in this area.

La Avenida de las Americas

 

I think Central Avenue's name south of the downtown area should be changed to Avenida de las Americas because it could provide for a Grande Avenue des Champs-Elisée type thoroughfare between the Phoenix downtown area and the proposed La Playa del Sol.

 

One possible development use for this area would be to locate La Playa del Sol Casino on the east side of Avenida de las Americas connecting the casino, convention center and La Playa del Sol hotels by monorail. On the west side of Avenida de las Americas would be a perfect site for a medical campus including the Ayuda Medical Clinic providing medical care to all and the location of a medical research campus.

 

Or we could follow Los Angeles' lead: 

 

New destination

Anschutz Entertainment Group plans to break ground today on the $1.7-billion L.A. Live “sports-entertainment” complex in downtown Los Angeles

Those behind L.A. Live seek a Times Square vibe while backers of a Grand Avenue development aim for the feel of the Champs-Elysees.

LOS ANGELES (By Cara Mia DiMassa, LATimes) September 15, 2005 — Downtown Los Angeles will soon be flanked by two massive developments — the Grand Avenue project, centered around Disney Hall on the north, and the L.A. Live project, centered around Staples Center on the south. Each promises to create a "heart" for downtown — but with different ways of beating.

Billionaire Eli Broad, who co-chairs the Grand Avenue Committee, envisions the Champs-Elysees, while mogul Tim Leiweke, who backs L.A. Live, sees a version of Times Square.

When Grand Avenue was unveiled earlier this year, it had the feel of a coronation. Three former mayors and other prominent city leaders spoke of how the $1.8-billion project, with upscale shopping and high-rise condos, as well as a 16-acre public park, would give downtown its center.

Anschutz Entertainment Group will break ground Thursday on L.A. Live, a $1.7-billion tourist-oriented "sports-entertainment" hub featuring a 55-story convention center and hotel, 7,100-seat theater, broadcast facilities, 14-screen movie theater and nearly a dozen restaurants and clubs.

L.A. Live, however, has become a lightning rod for criticism.

Downtown hotel operators say that the proposed Hilton Hotel might hurt business by flooding downtown with too many beds. And some of the new loft and condo dwellers cringe at L.A. Live's resemblance to Universal CityWalk — saying downtown doesn't need a "Disney-style" tourist draw.

The two developments raise larger questions about downtown's future: Should the area be a dense urban mix of housing, social services and the businesses to support them? Or should it serve as a tourist destination, catering to out-of-town guests with hotels and other venues?

"They're trying to capitalize on two different markets," said Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, chairwoman of USC's urban planning department. "But they don't want to lower the bar too much."

Downtown boosters say there is room for both, with Grand Avenue serving downtown's upscale urban dwellers, and L.A. Live the thousands of students who live in the area, as well as visitors to Staples and the struggling Convention Center.

The project, they said, would solidify two distinct vibes for north and south downtown.

Grand Avenue would rise near the loft district, in the midst some of the city's leading arts and cultural institutions, including the Museum of Contemporary Art and the Music Center. L.A. Live is rising in the shadow of the Lakers and Kings — in an area that hosted the X Games this summer and will soon be home to several new residential developments.

Pictures of the plan provided by AEG show a venue alive with light, people and advertisements. In addition to the project's main performance space, already named the Nokia Theatre Los Angeles, L.A. Live will include a Club Nokia, which could hold 2,200 people, and a 120,000-square-foot broadcast studio, which developers expect would serve as West Coast headquarters for a national television network.

AEG Executive Vice President Ted Tanner said he envisioned a pedestrian-friendly space. All of the restaurants on the site — which will include Gladstone's, Chaya Brasserie and P.F. Chang's — are being required to have outdoor dining.

But backers are also hoping to create a vibrant nightlife for the area. They say they have persuaded the Conga Room to relocate to L.A. Live from the Miracle Mile, and have signed on the founders of the clubs Prey and Shelter to develop a small club on the site.

In addition, a 30,000-square-foot-space — which is being called a "museum experience" — is planned to showcase the history of the Grammys. Leiweke said the museum would draw 1 million visitors a year to L.A. Live.

In addition, he said the site would be used for awards shows, live broadcasts, expositions and fan fests.

"Ultimately, we believe downtown Los Angeles can become a point of destination for the region," Leiweke said. "More importantly, L.A. can be the event capital of the world."

Still, some downtown residents complained that the project was not unique and reminded them of other big-scale complexes in the region, including the Grove and the Block at Orange.

Russell Brown, the head of the Residents Assn. of Downtown Los Angeles, called L.A. Live "Universal CityWalk, with all the tourist stuff."

"It's not a neighborhood hangout type of thing," he said. "In conjunction with Staples and the Convention Center, I could see where it would be very attractive for people outside of downtown…. I would probably take friends over there. But living in the historic core, I don't think I would be going there for dinner."

Others critics, most notably the owner of the downtown Westin Bonaventure Hotel, have complained about the approximately $82 million in public aid, including market loans, tax rebates and subsidies, that the Convention Center hotel is to receive.

Some of the money being lent to the developers originates from a Community Redevelopment Agency fund earmarked for Bunker Hill. That raises questions for attorney Chris Sutton, who represents Peter Zen, the owner of the Bonaventure.

"One, is it legal, and two, is it good public policy to move money like that?" Sutton asked "There's going to be a debate whether or not you are simply robbing Peter to pay Paul."

Carol Schatz, president of the Central City Assn. of Los Angeles, a downtown booster organization, argued that those subsidies are necessary. "No convention center hotel has been built [recently] in the U.S. … without some kind of assistance from the municipality involved," she said.

Leiweke was more direct. He said his firm was honoring a long-standing promise to public officials to develop a hotel near the Convention Center — and that Zen's criticisms stem more from jealousy than civic concern.

"At the end of the day," Leiweke said, "it's all about [Zen's] own personal greed. Put a billion dollars up, Peter, and then come talk to me about ethics and moral values."

By adding a large-scale hotel to the downtown mix, Leiweke said, the city will be able to compete with other downtowns that have long been draws for large-scale events.

He also dismisses criticism about the mall-like feel of the project.

"I hear people saying we are trying to recreate CityWalk or the Grove. It couldn't be further from the truth. There will be no Gap. There will be no Discovery Zones. None of that. We avoided that on purpose, because we don't think this is a place you come to shop.

"This is a place you come to enjoy. It's about taste, it's about sound, it's about sight," he said. "And that is not, in my opinion, the Grove or CityWalk. Maybe at one point, in CityWalk's history, they used to be that. But that's not what they bring in today."

Downtown Los Angeles, after decades of decline, is in the midst of a major upswing driven primarily by an influx of residents into high-rise condos and century-old buildings converted into lofts. The number of residents downtown has grown in the last few years from 18,000 to 24,000, and most of the new lofts have long waiting lists that suggest the demand for housing remains strong.

But residents have complained that downtown still lacks the basic services — such as supermarkets and service shops — they need. They also complain about a lack of open park space.

The Grand Avenue project, backers say, would address both concerns. The $1.8-billion retail and residential complex would include a shopping center, bookstore, multiplex movie theater and gourmet supermarket. The project also calls for a terraced park connecting Bunker Hill to the Civic Center.

Brown, the president of the residents association, said that he saw distinct differences between L.A. Live and Grand Avenue.

"If the two projects were more similar, they would be competition," Brown said. "But being at the opposite ends of the spectrum," he said, "they actually complement each other."

Estela Lopez, a downtown resident who is also the executive director of the Central City East Assn., which represents business interests in the toy and industrial districts of downtown, said she welcomed L.A. Live.

"Those of us who live downtown want to have more amenities. I look at L.A. Live not just for conventioneers," she said. "I see it as yummy. We are going to have more restaurants, more after-hours places."

 

Paid by the Committee to Elect Jon Garrido to the Phoenix City Council

 

The Federal Election Campaign Act prohibits contributions from corporations, labor unions, minors, and foreign nationals who are not admitted for permanent residence. In addition, under this law, all contributions must be made from personal funds and may not be reimbursed by any other person. Contributions are not tax-deductible. Contributions can be any amount up to $410 per person.

 

Join our Online Community

 

Contact Us

 

The Jon Garrido News Network

Web Design and Hosted by The Jon Garrido News Network, Phoenix, Arizona 85016 602.244.1000