New Page 3

Plan 468 "Phoenix Mixed Use Development Nodes"

"Job creation stands alone as the greatest need in Phoenix"

"It is time for change from Downtown to Midtown"

  

 

Comcast-Spectacor, the Philadelphia-based sports and entertainment firm, in a new and exciting partnership with world-renowned developers. Philly Live, a destination retail, dining and entertainment district in the area adjacent to the Wachovia Center in South Philadelphia, PA.
The City of Lenexa, KS has approved a concept plan and zoning for City Center North Village - a 67-acre mixed-use development. The retail partners, of Topeka engaged Arnold Imaging to create a rendering that would help the planning board understand the team's commitment to the great design and authentic spaces. The developer received their approvals shortly after unveiling the rendering.
The Magnum Development, mixed-use entertainment project in Omaha, Nebraska. The project is located on the former site of the Ak-Sar-Ben Race Track and Coliseum and is now being co-developed by 5 developers into a mixed-use urban village.

Mixed-Use Development Nodes

 

Plan 468 "Mixed Use Development Nodes" is to develop central nodes of mix used developments (jobs, housing, schools, retail, medial, leisure, open spaces, parks).

Mixed-use development is the practice of allowing more than one type of use in a development area or building or set of buildings.

In urban planning zone terms, this is defined as a combination of residential, commercial, office, institutional, or other land uses but does not require all land uses.

From an urban planning perspective, the ideal model for urban living is to work, live, shop, attend schools, churches, and have facilities for leisure activities. This eliminates the need to travel outside of the mixed used development node to work, go to school, go to a restaurant or any number of other destinations that now require some mode of transportation.

An added importance of an Mixed Use Development Node it builds community among the residents living with the "Node."

Another important consideration is the cost savings in fuel to drive to a destination any distance from residential use.

History

Throughout most of human history, the majority of human settlements developed as mixed-use environments. Walking was the primary way that people and goods were moved about, sometimes assisted by animals such as horses or cattle. Most people dwelt in buildings that were places of work as well as domestic life, and made things or sold things from their own homes. Most buildings were not divided into discrete functions on a room by room basis, and most neighborhoods contained a diversity of uses, even if some districts developed a predominance of certain uses, such as metalworkers, or textiles or footwear due to the socio-economic benefits of propinquity.

People lived at very high densities because the amount of space required for daily living and movement between different activities was determined by walkability and the scale of the human body.

This was particularly true in cities, and the ground floor of buildings was often devoted to some sort of commercial or productive use, with living space upstairs.

This historical mixed-used pattern of development declined during industrialization in favor of large-scale separation of manufacturing and residences in single-function buildings. This period saw massive migrations of people from rural areas to cities drawn by work in factories and the associated businesses and bureaucracies that grew up around them.

These influxes of new workers needed to be accommodated and many new urban districts arose at this time with domestic housing being their primary function. Thus began a separating out of land uses that previously had occurred in the same spaces.

Furthermore, many factories produced substantial pollution of various kinds. Distance was required to minimize adverse impacts from noise, dirt, noxious fumes and dangerous substances. Even so, at this time, most industrialized cities were of a size that allowed people to walk between the different areas of the city.

These factors were important in the push for Euclidian zoning premised on the compartmentalization of land uses into like functions and their spatial separation. In Europe, advocates of the Garden City Movement were attempting to think through these issues and propose improved ways to plan cities based on zoning areas of land so that conflicts between land uses would be minimized. Modernist architects such as Le Corbusier advocated radical rethinking of the way cities were designed based on similar ideas, proposing plans for Paris such as the Plan Voisin, Ville Contemporaine and Ville Radieuse that involved demolishing the entire center of the city and replacing it with towers in a park-like setting, with industry carefully sited away from other uses.

In the United States, another impetus for Euclidian zoning was the birth of the skyscraper. Fear of buildings blocking out the sun led many to call for zoning regulations, particularly in New York City. Zoning regulations, first put into place in 1916, not only called for limits on building heights, but eventually called for separations of uses. This was largely meant to keep people from living next to polluted industrial areas. This separation, however, was extended to commercial uses as well, setting the stage for the suburban style of life that is common in America today. This type of zoning was widely adopted by municipal zoning codes.

With the advent of mass transit systems, but especially the private automobile and cheap oil, the ability to create dispersed, low-density cities where people could live very long distances from their workplaces, shopping centers and entertainment districts began in earnest. However, it has been the post-second World War dominance of the automobile and the decline in all other modes of urban transportation that has seen the extremes of these trends come to pass.

Benefits

Throughout the late 20th century, it began to become apparent to many urban planners and other professionals mixed-use development had many benefits and should be promoted again. As American, British, Canadian and Australian cities reindustrialized, the need to separate residences from hazardous factories became less important. Completely separate zoning created isolated "islands" of each type of development. In most cases, the automobile had become a requirement for transportation between vast fields of residentially zoned housing and the separate commercial and office strips, creating issues of Automobile dependency. In 1961, Jane Jacobs' influential The Death and Life of Great American Cities argued a mixture of uses is vital and necessary for a healthy urban area.

Zoning laws have been revised accordingly and increasingly attempt to address these problems by using mixed-use zoning. A mixed use district will most commonly be the "downtown" of a local community, ideally associated with public transit nodes in accordance with principles of Transit-oriented development (TOD) and New urbanism. Mixed use guidelines often result in residential buildings with street front commercial space. Retailers have the assurance they will always have customers living right above and around them, while residents have the benefit of being able to walk a short distance to get groceries and household items, or see a movie.

Three Mixed Use Developments Nodes on Indian School Road ― West, Central and East

 

Geographically Indian School Road can be divided initially into three segments: west node, central node and east node. Each of the three nodal areas are unique in characteristics. The Plan 468 "Mixed Use Development Nodes" expands the concept and on implementation with focus on community participation to refine the concept of mixed use development nodes beginning on Indian School Road.

City of Phoenix Candidates for City Council, September 1, 2009

Robert D. Johnson, District 4: Bob Johnson’s decision to run for City Council is a culmination of years of commitment and dedication to Arizona and service to our community. As a third generation Irish-American and the first in his family to graduate from college (ASU 92) he understands working Arizonans, because that is what he is. Mr. Johnson has always taken the lead to organize neighbors to be active and involved. When his neighborhood needed leadership and direction, Mr. Johnson stepped to the forefront to organize and with his neighbors to eliminate graffiti, prostitution and drug trafficking. Mr. Johnson has worked in energy efficiency for more than fifteen years. Helping business use less energy to accomplish the same tasks saves money, lowers the amount of pollutants released creating energy and will create green collar jobs that pay living wages. Bob’s experience with working with and for local utilities across the US on Energy Management Programs will ensure a strong energy management/efficiency focus on the City Council.

Bob Johnson was the 2nd Vice Chair of the Democratic Party in Legislative District 15. He has coordinated numerous Democratic State Senate campaigns, worked as staff for Democratic campaigns in KS and AZ and ran the Don Harris campaign for Maricopa County Attorney (2004) through the successful Primary Election.

Bob Johnson has been a dedicated advocate for the rights and needs of working families through services to labor unions. Mr. Johnson has been an OIT, Organizer in Training, for AFSCME International, an Organizer for the Communication Workers of America, Local 7026 and a graduate of the AFL-CIO Organizing Institute.

Bob Johnson has worked in Energy Management/Efficiency for commercial and industrial clients for the last 15 years. Bob Johnson is holder of the Green Advantage Environmental Certification-Commercial and has been involved in projects that have removed thousand of tons of pollutants from our environment through energy efficiency projects. This knowledge of the LEED certification process, sustainability issues’ and energy management/efficiency programs will ensure that Phoenix receives its fair share of the Federal Stimulus Monies.

A history of commitment to public service makes Bob Johnson the ideal candidate to represent the people of City Council, District 4. Mr. Johnson was an Arizona Ranger from 2002 to 2005. He will fight for working families; with practical solutions to protect our neighborhood from crime is what Phoenix City Council District 4 needs.

Robert D. Johnson, Centrist Democrat, for Phoenix City Council District 4

Nathan Oshop, District 6: A successful management background, and a passion for humanity, is what Nathan Oshop aspires to bring to the People of Phoenix. Born in Pittsburgh PA January 2, 1979, Nathan spent most of his life living just outside Nashville, TN. There he found early success in his first corporate management position with a national oil change service. At the age of twenty Nathan was running a multi-million dollar a year business that set new standards in company efficiency, customer service, and volume. The Tennessee housing boom of the early part of this century provided Nathan the chance to hone his existing skills as well as adopt new ones. He again quickly advanced from an entry-level laborer to superintendent of a locally owned construction company. As the post 9/11 housing boom began to slow, Nathan recognized the need to adapt his existing skills to a more secure industry and started spending his increasing amount of spare time washing dishes at a locally owned restaurant. Six months later, he was the assistant manager, and general manger with in a year of that. The local values of Small business combined with an already strong skill set proved to be a profitable combination. It also allowed Nathan the chance to network with the managers and owners of the other local businesses. The open exchange of ideas, concerns, and techniques with his colleagues proved to be an experience that made him more effective as well as rekindled a life time fire for politics.

Eager for fresh experience Nathan and his Long time Girlfriend moved to Phoenix in 2008. She quickly found work following her passion as a therapist, working with those with Autism and the related disorders. Nathan struggled for months in the shrinking job market and was eventually fortunate enough to find an entry-level position with a multi-national retailer. The ability to contribute to his household again, allowed Nathan to again focus on his passion, and on May 1st, 2009, Nathan R. Oshop file his notice of candidacy to be the Council representative for District 6, of the City of Phoenix. When asked about his candidacy Nathan has this to say:

“The time has never been more right then now for change. I simply want to be heard, and I want the people of Phoenix to be heard”- Nathan Oshop. (http://site.beheardphoenix.org/Home.html)

Jon Garrido, District 8: 5th generation Arizonan; U.S. Army, Vietnam era, 34th General Hospital, 760th Medical Detachment; Magma Copper Company, Superior, Arizona, Copper Miner, Member of AFL-CIO; City of Tucson and Member of AFSCME, City Planner I, II & III, Economic Development Coordinator, Federal Public Works Coordinator, prepared application and obtained U.S. Department of Commerce approval establishing Tucson Foreign Trade Zone; City of El Paso Executive Director of Economic Development, Staff Director of El Paso Industrial Development Authority, prepared application and obtained U.S. Department of Commerce approval establishing El Paso Foreign Trade Zone; Owner and CEO of JG Manufacturing Company, Cuidad Juarez, Mexico; Director of Community Development, Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian Community; Vice President for Planning and Development, Valgroup (formerly largest real estate development company in Arizona); Owner & CEO of The Jon Garrido News Network (www.JonGarrido.com); Founder and President of the Blue Dogs of the Democratic Party (www.BlueDogs.US) and Member, Arizona Coalition for a State & National Health Plan.

 

Resume and family history at The Jon Garrido Story (http://PhxAZ.org/Jon_Garrido.htm).

Jon Garrido believes commerce is what takes cities to a higher level when the creation of jobs is done in a mutualistic symbiotic relationship conceptualized from a vision of using proven policies to attract not only commerce but also visitors to a city to achieve world class destination status.

 

This is what Phoenix lacks!

 

In the eight years of the present City of Phoenix leadership, the only strategy is to develop Downtown Phoenix but the strategy is a dismal failure and without visitors (consumers), Downtown retail will never succeed.

 

Nobody in the entire world wanting a tourist experience will ever visit Downtown Phoenix to visit the Downtown ASU campus or the U of A medical school. No one!

 

Now Plan 468 "Indian School Road Corridor" will enable a forgotten part of Phoenix to become the heart of Phoenix developed in Midtown and known as the Plan 468 "Indian School Road Corridor."

 

Paid by the Committee to Elect Jon Garrido to the Phoenix City Council

 

The Federal Election Campaign Act prohibits contributions from corporations, labor unions, minors, and foreign nationals who are not admitted for permanent residence. In addition, under this law, all contributions must be made from personal funds and may not be reimbursed by any other person. Contributions are not tax-deductible. Contributions can be any amount up to $410 per person.

 

Join our Online Community

 

Contact Us

 

The Jon Garrido News Network

Web Design and Hosted by The Jon Garrido News Network, Phoenix, Arizona 85016 602.244.1000